Legal Analysis Of Post-Divorce Property Disputes Based On Marriage Agreements (Number 490/Pdt.G/2024/PN Cibinong)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69836/synergy.v2i1.220Keywords:
Perjanjian Kawin, Perceraian, Harta Bersama, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Kepastian HukumAbstract
A prenuptial agreement is a legal instrument that functions to separate the assets between husband and wife, both assets that existed before and those acquired during the marriage. However, in practice, the implementation of prenuptial agreements often raises issues in cases of divorce, especially when one party maintains control over assets that are legally owned by the other party. This study aims to examine the legal considerations of the judge in Decision Number 490/Pdt.G/2024/PN Cbi between Trisiana Waty versus Lim Cipto Halim, which relates to claims of ownership over assets after divorce as regulated in the prenuptial agreement. This study uses a normative legal research method with statute, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were obtained through analysis of court decision documents, legislation, and legal doctrines from experts. The research results indicate that the judge considering the existence of a prenuptial agreement as evidence of lawful separation of assets in accordance with Article 29 of Law No. 1 of 1974, but rejecting the lawsuit because there is still a case concerning the division of joint property in the Serang District Court that has not yet obtained permanent legal force. Thus, the prenuptial agreement is recognized as a binding legal norm, but its application remains subject to the principles of legal certainty and non-contradiction of decisions within the Indonesian civil court system.
References
Abdillah, M. (2025). INKONSISTENSI PERATURAN MENTERI PERHUBUNGAN NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2019 DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 22 TAHUN 2009.
Ary, K., Dewi, P., Fakultas, D., Universitas, H., Rai, N., Pendahuluan, I., Yang, K., & Esa, M. (2015). Pengaturan harta dalam perkawinan dalam perjanjian perkawinan. PENGATURAN HARTA DALAM PERKAWINAN DALAM PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN
Bakti, D., Alfath, B., Hukum, R., & Pasundan, U. (2025). PERAN HUKUM PROGRESIF DALAM MENCARI KEADILAN MENURUT SATJIPTO RAHARDJO. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11111/nusantara.xxxxxxx
Bartlett, R. C., & Collins, S. D. (2012). Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Vol. 10).
GENERAL THEORY OF LAW. (2006).
Hukum, F., Jember, U., Iriyanto, E., Hukum, F., Jember, U., & Hakim, P. (n.d.). Kepastian hukum putusan hakim dalam penyelesaian sengketa perkara perdata. 12(1), 33–48.
Indonesia, R. (1974). UU Presiden republik indonesia.
Jenderal, S., Konstitusi, M., Indonesia, R., & No, M. B. (2015). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perjanjian kawin memiliki kedudukan hukum yang kuat dan mengikat dalam sistem hukum perdata Indonesia, khususnya dalam menentukan status harta kekayaan setelah perceraian. Berdasarkan Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun (Issue 6).
Mutia, A. J., No, U. U., Perkawinan, U. U., Konstitusi, M., & Perkawinan, U. U. (2025). Konseptualisasi dan Penerapan Asas Hukum Kontrak dalam Perjanjian Perkawinan di Indonesia. 15(2).
Pasal, D., Tentang, K., Sah, S., & Syamsiah, D. (2021). KAJIAN TERKAIT KEABSAHAN PERJANJIAN E-COMMERCE BILA DITINJAU DARI PASAL 1320 KUHPerdata TENTANG SYARAT SAH PERJANJIAN. 2(1).
Perdata, P., Nomor, G., & Cbi, P. N. (2024). Halaman 1 dari 38 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 490/Pdt.G/2024/PN Cbi. 1–38.
Principles of Morals and Legislation Jeremy Bentham. (2000).
Privatum, L., Vi, V., Juli, N., Daad, O., Pasal, M., & Perkembangannya, P. D. A. N. (2018). PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM (ONRECHTMATIGE DAAD) MENURUT PASAL 1365 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA DAN PERKEMBANGANNYA. VI(5), 57–65.
Putusan, D., Agung, M., & Ag, N. K. (2024). LEGAL REASONING HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG.
Rohman, M. F. (2015). IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN. 7(April 2017), 1–27.
Simandjuntak, R., Sarumaha, P. B., Hukum, S., Manado, U. N., Mahasiswa, S., Studi, P., Hukum, I., Ilmu, F., & Manado, U. N. (2024). Civilia : Peran Hakim dalam Menjamin Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Proses Peradilan Civilia : 7(1), 189–192.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Latifah Lala, Rida Ruwaida, Wiguno, Yaqin Qobul (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
