Judicial Review of the Audi et Alteram Partem Principle in Denpasar Administrative Court Ruling No. 2/G/LH/2018/PTUN.DPS

Authors

  • Hana Nailah Abiliah Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Author
  • Raine Graciea Firdaus Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Author
  • Shifaunissa Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69836/ethos.v1i2.191

Keywords:

Principle of Audi et Alteram Partem, PTUN Denpasar No. 2/G/LH/2018/PTUN.DPS, Environmental Dispute, Legal Standing, Denial of Justice.

Abstract

The development of the Celukan Bawang Coal-Fired Power Plant Phase II has generated an environmental dispute that resulted in the Denpasar Administrative Court Decision Number 2/G/LH/2018/PTUN.DPS. This case is significant as it concerns the application of the audi et alteram partem principle, a fundamental principle guaranteeing the right of parties to be heard fairly, particularly in environmental disputes that are preventive in nature and involve broader public interests. This study aims to analyze the application of the audi et alteram partem principle in the decision and to examine its implications for access to justice for affected communities. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches, with secondary legal materials analyzed through qualitative descriptive analysis. The findings show that the panel of judges only fulfilled the formal hearing requirement by allowing the parties to submit their claims, but failed to meet the substantial hearing requirement by not seriously considering empirical evidence and substantive arguments presented by the plaintiffs. The termination of the case at the preliminary stage without examining the merits undermined the precautionary principle and weakened the protection of community environmental rights. In conclusion, the application of the audi et alteram partem principle in this decision was not optimal and resulted in a denial of justice in environmental law enforcement.

References

ABSTRAK - Lia Puji Astuti. (2023). https://digilib.unila.ac.id/82670/1/ABSTRAK%20-%20Lia%20Puji%20Astuti.pdf

Belakang, A. L. (2007). LEGAL STANDING WALHI SEBAGAI PENGGUGAT DALAM PERKARA TATA USAHA NEGARA. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ilegal-standingi-walhi-diakui-dalam-yurisprudensi-hol16922

Dua Desa Terpapar Limbah B3 Batubara, Warga Minta Pemerintah Tidak Tutup Mata | Bali Tribune. (2020). Diambil 6 Desember 2025, dari https://balitribune.co.id/content/dua-desa-terpapar-limbah-b3-batubara-warga-minta-pemerintah-tidak-tutup-mata

Greenpeace: PLTU di Celukan Bawang Meracuni Bali. (2018). Diambil 28 November 2025, dari https://mongabay.co.id/2018/04/26/greenpeace-pltu-di-celukan-bawang-meracuni-bali/

“Kami Tak Ingin Menghirup Asap Batu Bara”: Kisah Mereka yang Terdampak PLTU Celukan Bawang. (2018). Diambil 28 November 2025, dari https://www.vice.com/id/article/kami-tak-ingin-menghirup-asap-batu-bara-kisah-mereka-yang-terdampak-pltu-celukan-bawang/

Lumban Gaol, C. E. M. P., Isis Ikhwansyah, Nien Raples Siregar, & Elisantris Gultom. (2025). ANALISIS YURISPRUDENSI GUGATAN DAN PELANGGARAN HUKUM KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN OLEH KEGIATAN PERTAMBANGAN. Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 11(1), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v11i1.447

Muhammad Rizky Perdana1, Simon Siahaan2, Js. Mega Nanda Budi laksana3, Monika Sandani4, Irnanto Panca5, Daffa Radhwa6, Ahmad Wali7, Sonia Ivana Barus8 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Universitas. (2025). Peran Hukum Acara Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Inovasi Hukum Dan Kebijakan, 6(2), 1–23. https://ejurnals.com/ojs/index.php/jihk

Novtrisya, S., Putri, M., & Insan, I. H. (2024). ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DALAM PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEADILAN BAGI MASYARAKAT. Dalam Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Multidisipliner (Vol. 8, Nomor 6). https://oaj.jurnalhst.com/index.php/jikm/article/view/4039

Panjaitan, B. S. (2016). Buku Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.pdf (hlm. 63).

Perkara Perdata, P., & Prasetya, U. (2020). Analisis Asas Audi Et Alteram Partem dalam Proses. Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti/v2i2.657

Prasetya, U. (2020). Analisis Asas Audi Et Alteram Partem dalam Proses Persidangan Perkara Perdata (Perkara Nomor 20/Pdt.G/2019/PN Pwr). Amnesti Jurnal Hukum, 2(2), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v2i2.657

UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1986 TENTANG PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA. (1986). www.djpp.depkumham.go.id

UU Nomor 51 Tahun 2009. (2009). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38851/uu-no-51-tahun-2009

Wibisana, A. G., & Fadhillah, F. (2022). BUKA SIAPE SAMBEHIN INJIN: KOMENTAR ATAS PUTUSAN TENTANG IZIN LINGKUNGAN PLTU CELUKAN BAWANG. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol52.no1.3333

Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode Normatif dan Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum: Studi Eksploratif di Indonesia. Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.