ASEAN's Role in Addressing the Myanmar Crisis: Challenges and Prospects for Regional Peace

Authors

  • Abiyyu Ahnaf Bayana Abi Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Author
  • Diwan Azka Purwananda Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Author
  • Muhammad Daffa Pratama Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Author
  • Muhammad Adjie Pratama Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Author
  • Dr. Elly Nurlia., M.Si Penulis Merupakan Dosen Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69836/synergy.v1i2.144

Keywords:

ASEAN, MYANMAR CRISIS, FIVE POINT CONSENSUS, NON-INTERFRENCE, REGIONAL SECURITY

Abstract

The military coup in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, marked a critical setback for the country’s democratic transition and triggered one of the most severe political and humanitarian crises in Southeast Asia. This paper aims to analyze ASEAN’s effectiveness in addressing the Myanmar crisis through the implementation of the Five-Point Consensus (5PC). Using a qualitative approach and library research method, the study explores ASEAN’s normative and institutional limitations in responding to internal conflicts that have regional implications. The research employs Normative Institutionalism and Regional Security Complex Theory as analytical frameworks to explain how ASEAN’s fundamental principles particularly non-interference and consensus decision making shape the organization’s cautious and non-coercive diplomacy. The findings reveal that ASEAN’s response remains largely symbolic and lacks enforcement mechanisms, resulting in low implementation effectiveness. Factors such as institutional weaknesses, normative constraints, and divergent geopolitical interests among member states further hinder progress. The study proposes a Five-Point Consensus Plus (5PC+) model, emphasizing measurable indicators, independent monitoring, and civil society engagement to strengthen ASEAN’s peacebuilding capacity. In conclusion, ASEAN must undergo institutional reform and reinterpret its norms to enhance its credibility as a regional peace and security actor.

Author Biographies

  • Diwan Azka Purwananda, Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

    Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

  • Muhammad Daffa Pratama, Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

    Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

  • Muhammad Adjie Pratama, Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

    Mahasiswa Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

  • Dr. Elly Nurlia., M.Si, Penulis Merupakan Dosen Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

    Penulis Merupakan Dosen Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

References

Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. Routledge.

Ar Rasyid, A. M., & Khairur Rijal, N. (2023). Peran ASEAN dalam Menangani Krisis Kemanusiaan Myanmar melalui Kesepakatan ASEAN Five Point Consensus. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v7i1.423

ASEAN Charter. (2008). Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

ASEAN Charter. (2008). Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.

ASEAN Secretariat. (2023). Chairman’s Statement on the Implementation of the Five-Point Consensus on Myanmar. Jakarta: ASEAN.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dermawan, W., & Gustaviani, L. (2023). Prinsip Nonintervensi dalam ASEAN Way: Menakar Kontribusi ASEAN dalam Resolusi Konflik di Myanmar. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.143

Gunawan, T. (2024). Between Principles and Actions: ASEAN and Indonesia in Dealing With The Political Crisis in Myanmar. Global Strategis, 18(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.18.1.2024.81-106

Kusuma, D. (2023). Strengthening Human Rights Mechanisms in ASEAN: The Role of AICHR in Regional Crisis Response. Journal of Southeast Asian Law, 15(2), 112–130.

March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. Free Press.

March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. Free Press.

Narine, S. (2020). The ASEAN Way and the Myanmar Crisis: Challenges for Regional Diplomacy. Asian Journal of Political Science, 28(3), 301–320.

Severino, R. (2011). ASEAN Beyond Fifty: Challenges and Prospects in the 21st Century. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thuzar, M. (2021). ASEAN’s Response to Myanmar’s Coup: Between Principles and Pragmatism. ISEAS Perspective, 2021(48), 1–10.

Weatherbee, D. (2022). Myanmar and ASEAN: The Limits of Regional Diplomacy. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2022(1), 45–63.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-06

How to Cite

ASEAN’s Role in Addressing the Myanmar Crisis: Challenges and Prospects for Regional Peace. (2025). Synergy: Journal of Collaborative Sciences , 1(2), 206-219. https://doi.org/10.69836/synergy.v1i2.144